Android tablets don't impress developers

 

Smitten with Apple.

Google's Android platform has lost some allure for software developers still smitten with Apple, while Research In Motion and Microsoft have fallen further behind the two leaders, according to a survey on what devices new apps are likely to be developed for.

Developers seem to have tempered their enthusiasm for the onslaught of tablet computers being launched to try to rival the runaway success of Apple's iPad.

Both Android for tablets and RIM's just-launched PlayBook have faded, the survey, released on Tuesday, showed.

Developer intent is a useful indicator of broader interest in a platform as consumers are drawn to devices that can perform specific tasks such as checking news or stock prices, tracking how far you've run or finding nearby restaurants.

Apple's iPhone has the attention of more than 90 percent of developers surveyed by research firm IDC and app platform Appcelerator, while 86 percent intend to develop for the iPad and 85 percent are "very interested" in Android phones.

It's a tough sell after that, even for Android's tablet software at 71 percent, which has developers fretting about fragmentation and the subdued interest in products, such as Motorola Mobility's Xoom, actually using it.

For developers, "it's becoming problematic to really put a foot down on Android tablets and know that you're standing on terra firma, at least as of today," Appcelerator's Scott Schwarzhoff said.

Microsoft's tie-up with Nokia would likely have the biggest impact in chasing down Apple and Google, the survey showed, while RIM's decision to support Android for its PlayBook tablet will help the BlackBerry maker.

Interest in both Microsoft's Windows Phone 7 and BlackBerry for phones fell from near 40 percent to below 30 percent, with Microsoft's shallower descent putting it slightly ahead.

RIM's PlayBook, which uses a new platform RIM plans to eventually migrate to its smartphones, dipped to 20 percent after heavy promotion among developers had piqued interest in the previous quarter's survey. PlayBook was launched in the United States and Canada after Tuesday's survey was conducted.

Schwarzhoff said a rival company's best bet would be to offer a unique experience Apple can't easily match, such as tight integration with business processes, or to make sure it is not a hassle for a developer to move programs to the platform.

"You have to really think about compatibility and migration layers between the top tier and your own operating system," he said.

The survey questioned 2,760 developers, about 40 percent each from Europe and North America and 20 percent from elsewhere.

(Reporting by Alastair Sharp; editing by Peter Galloway)

Copyright Reuters Copyright Reuters. Click for restrictions.



Android tablets don't impress developers
"Why man ? Optus Tablet is just $149 and going down to $99 recently plus Android is more flexible and not as restrictive as iOS but still people choose ipad since it is more famous and looks ..."
By JohnHenry
 
 
 
Comments: 2
mrhasbean
Apr 27, 2011 9:16 AM
Well, from a developers perspective, lets do a comparison. While Android is opensource, it's far from open, with Google enforcing their total control over the platform if you want to use their moniker and marketplace, this being even more-so the case with Honeycomb, so really, any advantage, perceived or otherwise, that Android had over iOS from that perspective has been all but nullified.

So then it comes down to profitability. On the iPad side you have a single platform, with a consistent hardware configuration, all tightly integrated, regular updates from a known supplier, an App Store that provides security to individuals and companies by ensuring that Apps don't have little built-in surprises while at the same time protecting the developer from piracy and giving you the ability to seed your application to up to 100 beta testers.

On the Android side you have a hodgepodge of mixed up configurations running numerous customised versions of "Android" on multiple hardware configurations with no pattern or even guarantee of any updates pushed or otherwise, or even any guarantees that it will actually work out of the box - all of which makes it look and run like a bucket of poo in most cases - and numerous app repositories that don't provide any security for either the seller or the buyer.

So ask yourself, if you made your income from doing this, which path would you take? It's not about being smitten with Apple at all - there are many iOS developers who can't stand a bar of Apple - but Microsoft haven't yet delivered on the potential of Windows Phone (Mobile) 7, HP are fluffing about with WebOS trying to do a Google and waving the opensource flag with one hand while bolting the door shut with the other, and Android in its current form is a steaming pile of dog mess, so there is absolutely no reason why anyone who actually makes a living out of this stuff would go anything but iOS.
JohnHenry
Jun 9, 2011 10:19 AM
Why man ? Optus Tablet is just $149 and going down to $99 recently plus Android is more flexible and not as restrictive as iOS
but still people choose ipad since it is more famous and looks cool/better.
Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
 
Top Stories
Australian miners send drones to work
In-depth: Unmanned aerial vehicles in the resources sector.
 
The New Zealand telco problem
Opinion: Could Telstra save Kiwi telcos?
 
IT price probe to 'name and shame' gougers
Industry ducking the issue, committee claims.
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
Polls
Should the Government enact new legislation to protect copyright holders in the digital age?

   |   View results
Yes
  19%
 
No
  81%
TOTAL VOTES: 510

Vote