Android exploit code published

 

Flaw in WebKit browser framework.

An attack code, which could be used to exploit a number of different versions of Google’s Android OS, has been published.

The code exploits a flaw in the WebKit browser framework, a vulnerability that has previously been seen in Apple’s Safari browser.

Alert Logic security researcher M.J. Keith was responsible for making the code public last week, noting how it could be used to gain control over certain functions in the OS.

The researcher showed how visiting a website containing the malicious code on an Android 2.1 phone could allow him to run a simple command line shell in the OS, according to reports.

In turn, this would allow the hacker to compromise the OS, although it would not give them complete control as Android sections off its different components from one another.

However, an attacker could still access anything the browser reads.

At the time of publication, Google had not offered any comment on the security researcher’s findings.

While Android 2.2 remained unaffected by this particular attack, less than two-fifths of all Android users have that version.

According to official Google statistics, Android 2.1 is the most used version of the OS, with over 40 percent of users running it.

The code went public just days after a Coverity study showed various weaknesses in Android’s central kernel.

A total of 359 flaws were discovered, a quarter of which were ranked as high risk.

Commenting on the report, Gartner vice president and distinguished analyst Nick Jones said Android will never be truly secure as it lacks a central authority to keep it safe.

“Those managed by a single owner such as Apple, Windows Phone 7 and RIM are better able to ensure higher security,” Jones claimed in a blog.

“However even the best of platforms will have weaknesses.”

This article originally appeared at itpro.co.uk

Copyright © ITPro, Dennis Publishing


Android exploit code published
"I think this is classed as a 'moderate' security risk with low chance of attack. Higher security through code through code secrecy is not as good as higher security with open code in the long ..."
By Ace
 
 
 
Comments: 3
Res
Nov 9, 2010 9:21 AM
"“Those managed by a single owner such as Apple, Windows Phone 7 and RIM are better able to ensure higher security,” Jones claimed in a blog"

d4ft4#$2 sorry, just had to get back up off the floor ...

I havn't had a good laugh like that first thing in the morning for a looooonnnggg time.

Did Nick forget he is commenting for Gartner and not his night job at the Comedy Club?
Ezy2Confuze
Nov 9, 2010 3:55 PM
It's actually great that these types of stories are coming out about other OS'es flaws, it's certainly shutting up the M$ bashers out there.
Ace
Nov 9, 2010 5:14 PM
I think this is classed as a 'moderate' security risk with low chance of attack.

Higher security through code through code secrecy is not as good as higher security with open code in the long term. But open OS's like Linux & Android need quality security coding when deployed to the online masses. Even proprietary systems struggle in the online environment, a fact that I'm sure Microsoft can attest to.
Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
 
Top Stories
Australian miners send drones to work
In-depth: Unmanned aerial vehicles in the resources sector.
 
The New Zealand telco problem
Opinion: Could Telstra save Kiwi telcos?
 
IT price probe to 'name and shame' gougers
Industry ducking the issue, committee claims.
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
Polls
Should the Government enact new legislation to protect copyright holders in the digital age?

   |   View results
Yes
  20%
 
No
  80%
TOTAL VOTES: 507

Vote