Photographers protest restrictions this weekend

 
Page 2 of 2 | Single page

Australians were losing their cultural heritage, Duncan said, and defining images such as Max Dupain's The Sunbaker will become rarer. And he said the photography vantage points around Uluru in the NT were fundamentally flawed for their stated intentions.

A Waverley spokesman said the beachside council didn't restrict photographers and referred to its sliding scale of fees.

"Waverley Council receives thousands of applications each year, particularly for Bondi Beach," she said.

"Waverley, like many other councils, has a permit system to help manage the high demand, make it equitable and help minimise the impact on residents, visitors and the local environment. The permit also ensures these organisations have public liability insurance."

It ensured professionals had public liability insurance but that those taking images for "personal interest do not need a permit".

She said rangers only intervene if photographers were "seen to be undertaking commercial or inappropriate operations and do not have a valid permit".

She said the council would take claims that officers had assaulted photographers "very seriously".

"However, no formal or anecdotal claim/complaint has been received by council."

click to view full size image
Future generations may have to rely on Google Earth for their iconic images if national parks services have their way, photographers' groups fear. source: http://frank.itlab.us

A NSW Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water that covers the state's national parks referred to its film and photography policy and said the department "generates zero revenue from filming activities".

"Park visitors and amateur photographers can take as many photos, film or videos for their personal interest as they like, to share with friends and family and as mementoes of their visit, includes uploading photos to Facebook and Flickr," the spokesman said.

"Small-scale commercial stills photography and filming for weddings are able to apply for an annual approval to undertake these activities by way of an online registration form on the NPWS website.

"There is no NPWS charge associated with this approval, except for the park entry fees where they apply. "

Swainston estimated there were 15,000 photographic jobs at stake: "If we can't take photos there will be an awful lot of people looking for different employment because they can't sell cameras".

"The irony is 90 percent of the population now carries a camera in their phone and there's never been more photos taken but if you want to take a good picture we're now being told we can't."

He said the paradox was that even as professional gear became cheaper, easier to use and fell into the hands of enthusiasts, more restrictions were placed on their behaviour by heavy-handed authorities.

He said that a publication such as the seminal '80s coffee table book A Day in the Life of Australia "would be hard to attempt today" and some of its most-loved images impossible.

"The Uluru photograph would not be permitted today."

Copyright © iTnews.com.au . All rights reserved.


Photographers protest restrictions this weekend
"@Ace, no, the bounty hunters operating the mobile revenue cameras are part of the problem, not part of the solution, so their charter is to set up in the most profitable (ie, safest) locations ..."
By anonymous
 
 
 
Comments: 7
Ace
Aug 27, 2010 1:34 PM
I wonder if those new mobile speed camera operators are paying for a license?

Dare I say, bureaucracy gone mad?
Ezy2Confuze
Aug 27, 2010 5:20 PM
Looks like more of another case of Local Councils with delusions of granduer. Get rid of them, let either the State or The Federal Governemtn look after things.

Most local councils seem to be full of people who think they are gods gift, the things that really need to be sorted out aren't, however the next thing you know, there is a speed bump or roundabout in the middle of a perfectly good road, for no other reason than some idiot councillor needs to justify thier existinece.
Mordd
Aug 27, 2010 6:18 PM
"The Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority.... allowed photographers with fewer than 10 crew and using equipment limited to a tripod to film for free, but larger projects were issued with licences costing up to about $5500."

Honestly that seems fair enough to me, how many photographers have more than 10 ppl out in a crew that aren't commercial outfits. I'm sure theres overzealous rangers and councils out there, and the idea of having to register to prove you aren't a paedophile is laughable, but this whole issue seems like a storm in a teacup really.
walteradamson
Aug 27, 2010 6:23 PM
All part of Mark Webber's Nanny State syndrome. It certainly has gone mad. As the Queen of the Nanny State Virginia Trioli and ABC Radio will be swooning with delight !!
tuxcomputers
Aug 28, 2010 6:11 PM
Waverly Council are the WORST in the entire country, they even claim they have jurisdiction over people taking photos from light aircraft. Here is a fact sheet I was sent by the Divisional Manager of Bondi:
http://tinyurl.com/2w8f68v

The binding Policy set by the Director General specifically excludes Still photography unless it involves extra activities such as blocking streets etc. Read page 8 for yourself:
http://tinyurl.com/2vawbo8
Pilotyoda
Aug 28, 2010 7:31 PM
Just a financial rip-off of photographers.
Some insane justification for over-zealous rangers to steal your equipment.
As for protection against pedophiles, how does a fee to take a photo of a puddle protect kids? I imagine pedophiles would rejoice at paying a fee to be left alone to do their sick stuff!
anonymous
Aug 30, 2010 10:11 AM

@Ace, no, the bounty hunters operating the mobile revenue cameras are part of the problem, not part of the solution, so their charter is to set up in the most profitable (ie, safest) locations with the beaming approval of the government.
Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
 
Top Stories
Australian miners send drones to work
In-depth: Unmanned aerial vehicles in the resources sector.
 
The New Zealand telco problem
Opinion: Could Telstra save Kiwi telcos?
 
IT price probe to 'name and shame' gougers
Industry ducking the issue, committee claims.
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
Polls
Should the Government enact new legislation to protect copyright holders in the digital age?

   |   View results
Yes
  20%
 
No
  80%
TOTAL VOTES: 507

Vote