Man fined $1650 for Twitter 'bomb threat'

 

Joke tweet lands 26-year-old a criminal record.

A man has been fined £1000 (A$1650) and given a criminal record after being found guilty of posting a "menacing" message on Twitter threatening to blow up an airport.

Paul Chambers, 26, posted a message on 6 January which said: "Crap! Robin Hood Airport is closed. You've got a week... otherwise I'm blowing the airport sky high!"

It was passed to South Yorkshire Police and Chambers was arrested and charged under the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) - under section 127 of Britain's Communications Act.

Robin Fry, a partner at law firm Beachcroft believes that Chambers was "very unlucky" to have been prosecuted, and that the decision set a "worrying precedent" for electronic messages to be interpreted in this way under the Act.

"In essence, messages like this are offences bordering on thought-crime. Even if none of your group of friends receiving the message would be offended, or indeed if none of them read it because of a delivery failure, it's still an offence," he said.

"With more recorded conversations taking place than ever before, there could well be many more cases like this in the future. Many people could be infringing the law now without knowing it."

Immediately after the trial, Chambers updated his status on the site to read: "I'd like to thank the CPS for their level-best efforts in f**king up the life of an ordinary citizen. I love Britain."

Twitter users also expressed their outrage under the hashtag #twitterjoketrial, and many are considering setting up an online account to help pay Chambers' fine.

Copyright ©v3.co.uk


Man fined $1650 for Twitter 'bomb threat'
"In this case I think the prosecution is completely warranted, and ill explain exactly why. Lets say he had phoned the airport, been told it was closed, and then said to the staff member on the ..."
By Mordd
 
 
 
Comments: 1
Mordd
May 12, 2010 4:05 PM
In this case I think the prosecution is completely warranted, and ill explain exactly why.

Lets say he had phoned the airport, been told it was closed, and then said to the staff member on the phone the exact thing he tweeted, word for word, he would have been tracked down and prosecuted exactly the same as in this case, and I doubt anyone would have objected in that instance.

The fact that he tweeted the comment makes no difference in my opinion. A threat made against a place or person like that, made in a public medium, is an offence and the person deserves to be prosecuted.

Lets take the analogy one step further, what if he was physically in the airport, they closed it, and as he walked out he yelled out over his shoulder the exact same comment he tweeted word for word. Security or police would have arrested him on the spot and he would be prosecuted for the offence.

If people cannot understand that making threats as jokes is neither funny nor a joke, then they deserve to be prosecuted to the full extent of the law to set an example to others. I have zero sympathy for the person in this case and congratulate the UK government for opting to prosecute him for the offence.
Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
 
Top Stories
The New Zealand telco problem
Opinion: Could Telstra save Kiwi telcos?
 
IT price probe to 'name and shame' gougers
Industry ducking the issue, committee claims.
 
Revealed: 2012 e-government award winners
Government highlights projects, professionals of the year.
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
Polls
Should the Government enact new legislation to protect copyright holders in the digital age?

   |   View results
Yes
  19%
 
No
  81%
TOTAL VOTES: 480

Vote