Perth man faces spam action in NZ

Powered by SC Magazine
 

Government files High Court case.

The New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs has lodged a High Court case against Perth businessman Wayne Mansfield over an alleged email spam operation.

The department accuses Mansfield of using a number of email address lists to promote business and marketing seminars in New Zealand.

The department alleges the unsolicited emails were sent to NZ addresses from a .co.nz domain registered to Mansfield or his agents, and that the servers and computers used to access the messages were located in New Zealand.

Mansfield faces a maximum fine of NZ$200,000 under the Unsolicited Electronic Messages Act 2007 if found guilty, the department said.

He has 25 working days to respond to the statement of claim. No date for a hearing has been set.

iTnews contacted Mansfield via email but didn’t receive a response.

Details of the statement of claim were also being sought at the time of publication.

A department spokeswoman confirmed it is the same Mansfield that was disqualified from managing corporations by the Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC) in 2009.

In 2005, Mansfield's company Clarity1 was taken to court by the Australian Communications and Media Authority for sending 56 million spam emails the year before.

In October 2006, a penalty of $4.5 million was imposed on Clarity1 with another million dollars on Mansfield himself.

Copyright © iTnews.com.au . All rights reserved.


Perth man faces spam action in NZ
 
 
 
Top Stories
Can the ATO use IT to shed its old-school reputation?
Inside the ‘reinvention’ at the hands of new management.
 
JB Hi-Fi's new CIO gets 'clean slate' for change
New AusPost, Tabcorp exec to get his hands dirty.
 
 
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...
Latest Comments
Polls
Should law enforcement be able to buy and use exploits?



   |   View results
Yes
  14%
 
No
  51%
 
Only in special circumstances
  17%
 
Yes, but with more transparency
  18%
TOTAL VOTES: 843

Vote